surgery, CABG more effective than stents

Coronary artery bypass grafting, known as CABG for short, is more effective than stents in some cases. Scientists reached this somewhat surprising conclusion by studying the records of over 1,600 heart patients with multiple blocked arteries (The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, May 1, 2019).

When Is Open-Heart Surgery More Effective Than Stents?

For years, stents have been overtaking CABG surgery because placing stents is less invasive. However, a new study shows that for people with multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG results in lower one-year mortality. For patients who had undergone surgery, 7.2 percent died in the subsequent year. That result compares favorably to 11.5 percent of the patients who had undergone stent placement instead.

There were more than 800 patients in each group. In addition, the patients who had undergone bypass surgery were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital than those who had gotten stents.

What Should Heart Patients Do?

The authors recommend a heart team approach to diagnosis and treatment so that patients will get the best advice for their particular cardiac condition. People should realize that if they have problems in multiple coronary arteries, they might benefit more from bypass surgery. It appears to be more effective than stents in such situations.

This is not the first study to cast some doubt on the benefit of stents. Previously, researchers have found that people with stents suffer less from angina but do not survive longer. Above all, stents do not seem to improve heart attack survival rates.

Get The Graedons' Favorite Home Remedies Health Guide for FREE

Join our daily email newsletter with breaking health news, prescription drug information, home remedies AND you'll get a copy of our brand new full-length health guide — for FREE!

  1. Dean
    Coastal Oaks FL
    Reply

    It has long been suspected that angioplasty and stents were not as trouble free or as dependable as a CABG.

    For the less adventurous and/or misinformed, the minimally invasive treatment options discussed in this article are preferable to having your sternum sawed in two. It is a gruesome thought and to have this disfigurement and gore avoided at all costs would be the prevailing choice.

    The wide open feeling of 3, 4, or 5 new pathways installed in a CABG compares to having a sputtering car engine replaced with a supercharged dynamo. Anything you did before CABG, you can do afterwards, only better.

What Do You Think?

We invite you to share your thoughts with others, but remember that our comment section is a public forum. Please do not use your full first and last name if you want to keep details of your medical history anonymous. A first name and last initial or a pseudonym is acceptable. Advice from other commenters on this website is not a substitute for medical attention. Do not stop any medicine without checking with the prescriber. Stopping medication suddenly could result in serious harm. We expect comments to be civil in tone and language. By commenting, you agree to abide by our commenting policy and website terms & conditions. Comments that do not follow these policies will not be posted. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your cart

Total
USD
Shipping and discount codes are added at checkout.