The People's Perspective on Medicine

Can Fish Oil Really Help Your Heart?

Fish oil supplements prevent fatal heart attacks. The benefits are clearest among people who don't eat much fish. How much do you eat?

Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements on drugstore shelves. People take it to promote heart health, ease joint pain and relieve dry eyes. The value of omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil has been controversial for years, however.

Many health professionals believe that this dietary supplement is worthless. An analysis of ten clinical trials concluded that fish oil did not protect people with heart disease (JAMA Cardiology, March, 2018). The authors suggested that people with heart disease should not bother with fish oil. Many nutrition experts were quick to write off this dietary supplement.

What Does Science Say About Fish Oil?

Results of a large randomized placebo-controlled trial of fish oil have just been published in the New England Journal of Medicine (online Nov. 10, 2018).

The conclusions:

“Supplementation with n-3 [omega-3] fatty acids did not result in a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events or cancer than placebo.”

That sounds like the 1 gram of high-quality fish oil per day that half of the more than 25,000 volunteers took was pretty much of a dud. (The study used a product called Omacor and a look-alike placebo.) However, if you focus just on heart attacks or, even more important, fatal heart attacks, the data indicate that fish oil actually did offer benefit.

Fewer People Taking Fish Oil Had Heart Attacks:

Among the secondary end points were heart attacks, which were 28 percent less common among people taking fish oil. These participants were also only half as likely to suffer fatal heart attacks as people taking placebo. Those who got the most benefit were those who ate fish infrequently. Analysts warn, however, that secondary end points may be unreliable and need to be interpreted with caution.

A Study of Vascepa:

Another article published in the same issue of the New England Journal of Medicine presented results of a trial of a medication, icosapent ethyl, that is closely related to fish oil. Fish oil contains both eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Icosapent ethyl (Vascepa) is a purified form of EPA only.

The REDUCE-IT trial had more than 8,000 volunteers taking either Vascepa or placebo. These people were at high risk because they had high triglycerides despite taking statins. Many of them also had heart disease.

In this study, 17 percent of the patients on Vascepa had a cardiovascular complication, compared to 22 percent of those on placebo. During the nearly five years of follow-up, 4.3 percent of those taking Vascepa died from cardiovascular causes compared to 5.2 percent of those on placebo. The difference is about 9 patients in 1,000 during the five years.

Praluent Performed About as Well:

Cardiologists were enthusiastic about another recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (Nov. 7, 2018).  The drug in question, alirocumab (Praluent), is an injectable cholesterol-lowering medication that costs over $6,000 a year. After three years, 3.5 percent of the high-risk heart patients taking Praluent had died. That was statistically better than the 4.1 percent who died while taking placebo. This is a difference of 6 patients in 1,000 over three years.

The news reports about Praluent were far more complimentary than those for either of the omega-3 products, even though the results roughly comparable. Perhaps it is time for health professionals to acknowledge that fish oil supplements may be beneficial after all. If that is too much to swallow, there is evidence that eating at least two servings of fish a week can help prevent fatal heart attacks (JAMA, Oct. 18, 2006).

The Downsides of Fish Oil:

We always like to make sure that people are aware of the potential side effects or unintended consequences of the supplements or medications that they take. A few red flags have gone up for fish oil.

Prostate Cancer:

Epidemiologists suggest men should be cautious about loading up on DHA (American Journal of Epidemiology, online April 24, 2011). They found men getting high levels of DHA had more than double the risk of an aggressive prostate tumor. There was no impact on the more common low-grade prostate cancer. Another study confirmed that men with high levels of omega-3 fats in their bloodstreams are at higher risk of prostate cancer (Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Aug. 7, 2013). However, an analysis covering omega-3 intake and prostate cancer risk of more than 450,000 men did not detect any association (Nutrition and Cancer, March 31, 2015).

Atrial Fibrillation:

For quite a while, doctors thought that people getting more omega-3 fats would be less prone to heart rhythm disturbances such as atrial fibrillation, or Afib.  A Canadian study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Oct. 2014) was a randomized controlled trial of 337 people with atrial fibrillation. This common heart rhythm abnormality can lead to a heart rate as fast as 150 beats a minute.

Volunteers in the trial took either 4 grams of fish oil or placebo daily for as long as 16 months. Sadly, those taking fish oil did not have fewer bouts of atrial fibrillation than those on placebo, nor did they have evidence of lower levels of inflammation.

A review of research on the use of omega-3 fatty acid supplements to prevent or treat atrial fibrillation found inadequate evidence of efficacy (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Sep. 22. 2015). The question is not settled, however, as another review concluded with “the possibility that these fatty acids could be beneficial in hypertensive patients” (Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Jan. 30, 2018).

The People’s Pharmacy Perspective:

We think that reducing fatal heart attacks by 50 percent with fish oil is worthwhile. However, men concerned about prostate cancer and people who have experienced atrial fibrillation might want to stick with eating fish at least two or three meals a week. Even canned tuna or sardines count.

Rate this article
star-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-empty
4.8- 21 ratings
About the Author
Terry Graedon, PhD, is a medical anthropologist and co-host of The People’s Pharmacy radio show, co-author of The People’s Pharmacy syndicated newspaper columns and numerous books, and co-founder of The People’s Pharmacy website. Terry taught in the Duke University School of Nursing and was an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Anthropology. She is a Fellow of the Society of Applied Anthropology. Terry is one of the country's leading authorities on the science behind folk remedies. .
Cholesterol Control & Heart Health
$2.00

Download the guide: Heart disease is still a top killer, and high cholesterol is an important risk factor. 8 pages on the pros and cons of statins as well as non-statin drugs for cholesterol.

Cholesterol Control & Heart Health
Join over 150,000 Subscribers at The People's Pharmacy

We're empowering you to make wise decisions about your own health, by providing you with essential health information about both medical and alternative treatment options.

Showing 8 comments
Comments
Add your comment

Just read here that Praluent cost was over $12,000/yr. At my pharmacy here it’s over $13,000. I declined. I have some extra cholesterol I could donate to anyone who can extract it!

I take fish oil to reduce inflammation from arthritis and in inflammation in general, rather than for heart disease. What is your opinion on studies that support fish oil for that purpose?

Thank you for this excellent summary of the research. Invaluable, as always.

Somehow I won’t be surprised if there is now a “refined” fish oil on the market that will require a prescription (therefore patentable and thereby enabling FAR higher prices to be charged). Then the medical community will suddenly perceive it to be much more efficacious, and soon every American will need to be on it. Of course, the prescription version will be the ONLY one that has any benefit, and it will no doubt be miraculous.

The article writers will have a vested interest in championing costly drugs over fish oils (with similar results) anyway. The very people who advocate critical review think we’re mugs.

What brand(s) of “fish oil” were used? The quality could make a significant difference in the results. Was “krill oil” used in any of the studies?

What is the recommended dosage that you endorse for fish oil supplements?
How much EPA and DHA daily?

Thank you.

I’d also like to know what PP suggests as the optimum daily dose of both the elements in ‘Fish Oil” or Flax Seed oil as an Omega 3 source.

* Be nice, and don't over share. View comment policy^