The Big PHARMA Relief Act
Joe and Terry's Blog November 6, 2006
When Congress passed the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit for seniors, we thought that something smelled suspicious. The pharmaceutical industry has generally resisted government involvement in its business. Why, we wondered, did big Pharma seem pleased with this huge government program?
Now that we are approaching the first anniversary of Medicare Part D, the answers are becoming apparent. This was a massive benefit for the pharmaceutical industry.
First, it was a fantastic relief valve for all the negative publicity that had been building for years about skyrocketing drug prices. Remember when Congressmen used to take well-publicized bus trips to Canada with senior citizens who wanted to purchase less expensive drugs? Those days are long gone. All the negative press about older people having to eat dog food so they could afford their medicine is over.
But prices are still going up and up and up! According to the Wall Street Journal (Nov. 6, 2006), “Companies have raised prices on many top-selling medicines by 6 percent or more this year, double the overall inflation rate.� Yet the media and the public seem oblivious. The outrage is gone because everyone figures that Medicare Part D has solved the senior citizen price problem. The trouble is that everyone under 65 who does not have insurance is stuck with escalating drug bills. And those with insurance will inevitably see premiums rise as companies pass along their rising prescription drug costs.
Profits at many drug companies are soaring. It’s not just because they have raised prices so substantially. There were a couple of amazing loopholes in the Part D program. For one thing, negotiating price is not allowed under this law. Even though Uncle Sam (your tax dollars at work) is the ultimate payer for Part D, the government cannot arm-wrestle drug companies over the price they charge. We are about the only country in the world that doesn’t use our muscle to control drug costs. (This is almost certainly why Americans pay more for drugs than anyone else.)
There is one other fascinating and overlooked loophole. Before Medicare Part D, really poor folks had their medicines covered under Medicaid. This government-supervised program required a mandatory 15 percent discount off standard prescription drug prices. In some instances the discount was substantially greater. This saved you, the taxpayer, a ton of money.
Guess what? Under the new law, low-income senior citizens have been switched from Medicaid to Medicare and the discount is gone. That means many drug companies are experiencing a huge windfall.
Some experts estimate that next year Medicare Part D will cost us $50 billion, or one fifth of the entire drug bill in America. Since it comes out of the public trough, few folks will complain that we may not be getting our money’s worth. But we should, since we are all paying for it.
Perhaps it is time to look abroad where other countries have been negotiating prices with the pharmaceutical industry for decades. You know the old saying—he who pays the piper calls the tune! Maybe a new Congress will stiffen its spine and demand a bigger bang for our bucks.
Joe and Terry's Blog Main Page
Joe Graedon is a pharmacologist. Teresa Graedon holds a doctorate in medical anthropology and is a nutrition expert. Their syndicated radio show can be heard on public radio.
© 2006
Comments
I listen to your radio program every Sunday on NPR. Thanks for the interesting guests and great information.
Medicare Part D! Bah! Humbug! What a total rip off of the seniors. The pharms are ripping the government off, and the seniors off, and the tax payers off. They have the golden goose and the insurance companies are getting the golden eggs. It is an outrage that the wealthiest most powerful country in the world has such an antediluvian health system for its seniors. I pay $60 for a one month supply of Crestor and my sister who lives in Australia and is a senior gets one month supply of the same drug for $4!!!!!!
Thank you for letting me vent.
Posted by: Valerie Chisholm | November 7, 2006 4:47 PM
Our premiums will go from $47. to $82 for Husband and from$9.82 to 29.00 for me We did not have a doughnut hole before now we are in a real financial mess after about July. They no longer cover preferred drugs after $2400.00 Thank you George Bush for the wonderful program. The drug Companies ae really rolling in money.
Posted by: Marilyn | November 16, 2006 5:33 PM
on YOUR ARTICLE ABOUT ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS: I was prescibed Mobic for a back injury. 1% of the population experiences drastic memory lose. I am one. I am also alergic to many other drugs, including sulfa. Many of the NSAID's such as bextra contain sulfa. Most MD's don't have time to research the drugs for adverse reactions. My husband had taken samples of vioxx in 2002 after a car crash we were in. Needless to say, He had a heart attack. I never take anything without researching it on the web.
Posted by: Peggy Patrick Poirier | November 30, 2006 9:54 AM
I do not trust any of the pharmacitual copanies. And Doctors do not have the time to read everything that comes out about drugs. My Dr.got mad at me because I refused to take lipitor after reading the warnings.
Posted by: Joyce Colbert | December 3, 2006 9:38 AM
Call it a 'trend' or a conspiracy, but Medicare Part D certainly does its part to ensure that every person in this country 'has to' take at least one overpriced drug every single day, for life. It is fuel for the drug companies all the way around, in terms of unreasonable profit, taking choices out of the hands of the individual and the treating physician, and disconnecting supply and demand so that as Joe said we can't see that we aren't getting our money's worth. My fellow Americans, don't fall for it! Joe and Terry, thank you for all the work you do to help us realize we have choices.
Love the Show! And the best part: My husband loves the Show
Posted by: Cathy | December 10, 2006 4:11 PM