Subscriptions
  • Join our People's Pharmacy Page on Facebook
  • Follow JoeGraedon on Twitter
  • Follow Us
  • Free email newsletter

Print This Page

906 The New Germ Theory of Disease

  • Currently 4.3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not Helpful ..... Very Helpful
Did you enjoy this radio show? Average rating: 4.3/5 (80 votes)
What do you think? Click the stars to vote!
If you have more to say, post a comment below!

Click the arrow to play audio file:

click here if you cannot view audio player: PP-906Germs.mp3

Tune in to our radio show on your local public radio station, or sign up for the podcast and listen at your leisure. Here's what it's about:

Inflammation is a primary cause of many chronic conditions, from Alzheimer's disease and arthritis to asthma and inflammatory bowel disease. But what causes the inflammation? Could infectious agents be the root of most of our chronic disease--including cancer?

Find out about infections and mental illness. Is it possible that there is a link between schizophrenia and a common pathogen?

 Other hard-to-treat conditions such as multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) might all be triggered by infection. Could a vaccine help prevent these devastating conditions and even cancer?

 Guest: Paul Ewald, PhD, is professor of biology and director of the program on disease evolution at the University of Louisville. His books include Controlling Cancer: A Powerful Plan for Taking On the World's Most Daunting Disease, co-authored with Holly Swain Ewald, and Plague Time:The New Germ Theory of Disease.

The podcast of this program will be available the Monday after the broadcast date. The show can be streamed online from this site and podcasts can be downloaded for free for four weeks after the date of broadcast. After that time has passed, digital downloads are available for $2.99. CDs may be purchased at any time after broadcast for $9.99.

 

 

 

Buy This Show On CD or MP3
  • Currently 4.3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not Helpful ..... Very Helpful
Did you enjoy this radio show? Average rating: 4.3/5 (80 votes)
What do you think? Click the stars to vote!
If you have more to say, post a comment below!

6 Comments

| Leave a comment

Please see my paper, "Allergies and Schizophrenia: Immune System Starvation?", by Peg MacPherson Lamkin, published December 1981 in the Canadian Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry(now called Orthomolecular Medicine). Available online.


Allergies and Schizophrenia: Immune System Starvation?
Cached mental alterations rather than atopic allergy, and schizophrenia is seen as an extreme pole in a continuum of immune system starvation, with the variable factor ...

This paper, once called "confusing" was written in the hope of inspiring someone to do further research. Apparently no one did.

Its relationship to your work is this: Invasive germs will be attacked by the immune system. A very large and/or prolonged ttack will deplete the system until it can no longer fight. The body will attempt to raise other defenses. In the case of the subject in this paper, it fought with an overabundace of histamines resulting in "allergic rhinitis" --hay fever, then asthma, then much later, eczema.

ALL of these were cured after prolonged use of high dosage niacin. Different people, different deficiencies, no doubt, requiring different nutrients.

It isn't enough to try killing every savage invader on the face of the earth! Boost the immune system so it can fight its own battles!

NOTE: THE RESEARCH ON THIS PAPER stopped, but the subject continued the trial and ultimately the "allergies" disappeared completely.

Just taking lots of vitamins--or niacin--won't do it. These people need to be carefully evaluated to determine the nature of the deficiency.

Your interview only strengthened my suspicions that viruses or other organisms are what is behind many cancers etc. And I have felt very strongly that the body's immune system plays a large role in the effects of a disease.

You started out discussing inflammation and I feel it is the body's way of defending. I have some personal experience of this. Years ago I contracted Fifths disease which in my case made me more anemic then one could imagine possible, and with rheumatoid arthritis. As this was caused by a virus which is still in my system years later, if my body gets run down- I am suffering the same symptoms only not as severely (thank goodness because it was horribly debilitating).

I am wondering however why you feel a vaccine for the illness you spoke of would be a good idea. I understand the benefit of not acquiring a disease you have been exposed to, but I don't know if that route would be the least expensive. That would mean exposing people by injecting a small dose of the substance in order to hopefully create immunity. This may also expose people who haven't yet been immunized with possible unintended or even uncontrollable consequences. I can't help wonder if finding the root source of the disease may help people avoid it, and help researchers develop an actual cure.

Lastly, there was a peoples pharmacy show about a year ago regarding a treatment for people with C.O.P.D. This treatment was based on the evidence that C.O.P.D. was caused by an infection and involved administering antibiotics over an extended period of time. While I don't believe it is an optimum treatment, it points out that there are conditions where ridding the body of the cause of the problem solves the situation better then treating the symptoms. It's like going to the dentist with an abscess and being given pain killers or antibiotic- if the antibiotic gets rid of the source of the pain there is no need for the pain killers.

I also hope some research is done on natural ways to cure these diseases, whether it be vitamin deficiencies or antioxidants needed. In my case B12 and cod liver oil have helped with the anemia tremendously, and pomegranates and cherries help inflammation.

I agree with the previous person, Peg on this post. I believe there should be a way to determine if someone is suffering from certain vitamin deficiencies. It may be a matter of cures that involve changing ones diet. That would also be a step in the right direction.

Thank you, Peg! I wonder how extreme deficiencies are determined, and who does this? Is hair analysis acceptable?

While listening to the interview with Dr. Ewald, I had to wonder if treatment with proteolytic enzymes might sometimes be effective in preventing the types of illnesses he described as having resulted from infections. It's my understanding that proteolytic enzymes, taken between meals, will digest the protein-based defense of viruses, bacteria, fungi, yeasts, cancer cells, and food allergens.

Thank you for this broadcast, it was very informative.

What struck me, particularly, was Dr. Ewald's comments in relation to virii and bacteria and how these organisms, once inside our bodies, can facilitate and/or cause infection and disease. The link between Toxoplasma gondii and Schizophrenia and intestinal maladies (because of consuming items tainted with the bacteria) was very revealing and alarming, but the public deserves to know the truth!

I agree with previous posters. It seems to me that it is ridiculous to develop a vaccine for every bacteria and virus out there. That would neither be safe nor efficient. It seems that the reason these chronic deceases are rising is not the presence of those germs (they are there anyway) but the fact that our bodies can't deal with them anymore.

Couldn't one likely reason be that since we are vaccinated so early in life, we do not even get to build up our immune system the "right" way, so it is fit to fight off invaders? Or is overusing of antibiotics creating more aggressive and resistant germs? Leading a healthy life style is obviously part of preventing some of these cancers/deceases as well.
Anyway, still interesting show as always! I love the People's Pharmacy!!

Great show again Terry and Joe! The HPV vaccine was discussed a lot in connection with cervical and other cancers.
Here is the question:

Why is the HPV vaccine NOT recommended for men or women over age 26? I know that the reason is that Merck didn't fund a study on people over this age and the FDA can't approve unless there is some mass random double blind placebo controlled study of course. But I've run into people who have
taken the vaccine "off label" as I believe they call it. I've also heard that it is assumed that 80% of all males over age 26 are already carriers, but the vaccine would still prevent getting the infection, wouldn't it?

I can' find any clear info online about this.
One last thing: I know from a medical practitioner that one Merck employee in the sales force, who is way beyond the recommended age, took the HPV vaccine on their own off label because the person believed
so much in the drug and because they thought the risk was low. No side effects... in fact, one positive side effect: some warts on a couple of fingers went away after the vaccination! I know this is an anecdote, but I would appreciate Dr Ewald specifically addressing this question if he reads this blog.

Meanwhile, I'll try to email him directly and see if he addresses this in any of his writings. He is a very impressive and knowledgeable
person.

Leave a comment

Share your comments or questions with the People's Pharmacy online community. Not all comments will be posted. Advice from other visitors to this web site should not be considered a substitute for appropriate medical attention. Concerns about medications should be discussed with a health professional. Do not stop any medication without first checking with your physician.

Check this box to be notified by email when follow-up comments are posted.