The United States Preventive Services Task Force has officially recommended against the routine use of the PSA test to screen for prostate cancer. PSA, which stands for prostate specific antigen is a blood test. As the number rises the likelihood of an enlarged prostate or a tumor increases. The problem is that the PSA test is a poor predictor of dangerous prostate cancer. A large study of 180,000 men lasted 11 years. It found that, at best, one death from prostate cancer might be prevented by screening 1,000 men. Screening itself has some risks, because it can lead to biopsies and surgery. Erectile dysfunction and incontinence are not uncommon complications of surgery.
The American Urological Association is outraged. Many urologists believe that the PSA remains the best way to detect prostate cancer early. The task force concludes that doctors should be ready to discuss the benefits and risks of PSA tests and take patients’ preferences into account before routinely adding the PSA to a standard blood panel.
[Annals of Internal Medicine, online May 22, 2012]

Join Over 52,000 Subscribers at The People's Pharmacy

Each week we send two newsletters with breaking health updates, prescription drug interaction information, home remedies and our award-winning radio program. Join our mailing list and get the information you need to make confident choices about your health.

  1. Miffa
    Reply

    PSA Velocity, or the rate of rise of PSA, has been shown to be a useful indicator of aggressive PCa. However, to take advantage of this, you need a history of PSA levels. In order to have a history, you have to measure PSA periodically over time in asymptomatic, younger men. PSA Screening is in itself not a failed medical experiment, but what has been done with the results is.

  2. jeffrey dach md
    Reply

    PSA screening has eliminated advanced prostate cancer for the most part. However, according to Dr Welch in August JNCI, one million men were over-diagnosed and over-treated for prostate cancer over the last twenty years.
    Was PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer a 20 year failed Medical Experiment ?
    jeffrey dach md

  3. Joyce S.
    Reply

    If your doctor is going to draw blood anyway why not also have the PSA test done?
    PEOPLE’S PHARMACY RESPONSE: That would make sense for a man who had symptoms of prostate problems or one who had a family history of prostate cancer. For healthy guys, it’s a bit more like troubling trouble.

What Do You Think?

Share your thoughts with others, but be mindful of protecting your own and others' privacy. Not all comments will be posted. Advice from web visitors is not a substitute for medical attention. Do not stop any medicine without checking with the prescriber. In posting a comment, you agree to our commenting policy and website terms and conditions.