Flu season is right around the corner. That’s why the CDC (Centers for Disease Prevention and Control) “recommends a yearly flu vaccine for everyone 6 months of age and older as the first and most important step in protecting against this serious disease.” But how good is the flu shot when it comes to protecting against influenza or the complications of this viral infection?
The CDC’s answer to this question is ambiguous at best. Our premier public health organization says that effectiveness of the vaccine “can range widely from season to season.” If the match between the shot and the circulating viruses is bad, “It’s possible that no benefit from the vaccination may be observed.” If the match is very good, “substantial benefits” in preventing flu are observed. What does that really mean?
A brand new study by a leading infectious disease epidemiologist casts more doubt on the benefits of the flu vaccine. Michael Osterholm, PhD, M.P.H., is a prominent public health scientist. He and his colleagues reviewed 5,707 influenza articles in the medical literature that were published between Jan. 1, 1967 and Feb. 15, 2011 (The Lancet Infectious Diseases, online Oct 26, 2011). From that enormous number they narrowed their analysis down to 31 of the absolute best studies.
Of those top-notch investigations, there were 10 randomised, controlled trials that could be analyzed for overall efficacy. What Dr. Osterholm and his colleagues found was that together, the benefit was 59%. In other words, 41% of the people who got a flu vaccine experienced no protection against influenza.
In our opinion that’s disappointingly low. If your toaster only toasted your bread a little more than half the time you would demand your money back. Perhaps even more disheartening is the observation that there were no good trials for children between the ages of 2 and 17 or adults over the age of 65. Those are precisely the groups that are most vulnerable to complications from influenza.
This isn’t the first big study to suggest that the flu vaccine leaves a lot to be desired. An analysis in the Journal of Infectious Diseases (Jan. 15, 2010) concluded that when it comes to senior citizens: “the ‘effectiveness’ of the vaccine is in great part due to the selection of healthier individuals for vaccination, rather than due to true effectiveness of the vaccine” (Journal of Infectious Diseases, Jan. 15, 2010).
Even healthy younger people don’t have fewer sick days, shorter hospital stays or fewer deaths from influenza if they get vaccinated (British Medical Journal, Oct. 28, 2006).
Questions also persist about the benefits of flu shots for babies and toddlers under two. Although they are more vulnerable to influenza complications, the data suggest that most flu vaccines are not terribly effective for these young ones (Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, April 16, 2008).
The authors of the most recent study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases call for improved vaccinations. We couldn’t agree more. It is sad that after so many years we still lack a highly effective flu shot.
What can people do while we wait for something better? We think that at this time of year vitamin D supplementation makes a lot of sense. Grandmothers all over the world knew that in the fall and winter they needed to encourage their children and grandchildren to take cod liver oil. They didn’t know why, but they frequently dosed the family with foul-tasting cod liver oil, which contained vitamin D as well as omega-3 fatty acids. This was especially true in northern countries like Scandinavia where sunlight is in short supply at this time of year.
Research now suggests that the grandmothers were on to something. A study published in the British Journal of Nutrition (June, 2011) concluded that there is a strong relationship between vitamin D levels, respiratory infections and lung function. An article published in Epidemiology and Infection concluded that “Vitamin D deficiency predisposes children to respiratory infections…An interventional study showed that vitamin D reduces the incidence of respiratory infections in children.” The same authors concluded in the journal Alternative Medicine Reviews that “Theoretically, pharmacological doses of vitamin D may produce enough of the naturally occurring antibiotic cathelicidin to cure common viral respiratory infections, such as influenza and the common cold, but such a theory awaits further science.”
So science is beginning to catch up with grandma. The doctor could also prescribe an antiviral drug such as oseltamivir (Tamiflu), amantadine, rimantadine or zanamivir (Relenza) to help some people recover from influenza faster than they normally would.
Ultimately, we do need a better influenza vaccine. In the meantime, though, there are some things that may help you avoid the flu. Wash your hands religiously. Consider every surface you touch when you are out in public a possible source of flu virus–that includes gasoline pump handles, ATM buttons and banisters. Keep your fingers out of your eyes and nose, no matter how good a job you do washing your hands.
If you have any question about vitamin D, you can get a blood test for 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Keep your levels above 20 ng/ml. Some health experts recommend levels above 30 ng/ml at this time of year. If flu is widespread in your community and you start to feel ill, ask your MD about a rapid flu test and inquire if a prescription is warranted for one of the antiviral medications.

Join Over 53,000 Subscribers at The People's Pharmacy

Each week we send two free email newsletters with breaking health news, prescription drug information, home remedies and a preview of our award-winning radio show. Join our mailing list and get the information you need to make confident choices about your health.

  1. linda
    Reply

    The year H1N1 went around that you remember your kids sick after vaccine:
    The vaccine for that flu first came out at the exact peak of the pandemic (remember pandemic does not mean severity it means how common it is), later than they would have liked. That was the point that the very MOST people around your kids were either sick with flu, carrying the flu (to spread) but asymptomatic, or incubating the flu before they later got sick. Flu was around, and children were by far most susceptible to that particular flu.
    Flu incubates for a number of days, and in kids they can be carriers for a week after they recover.
    It takes 2 weeks for immunity from the flu shot to develop.
    If only ONE Of your kids was exposed to ONE person in their crowded classroom who was incubating, had, or was recovering from the flu within those two weeks… which seems quite reasonably possible doesn’t it? They could have easily caught it, and brought it home to all.
    The association you see for THAT year time was could theoretically be… as you say..”get flu shot… get the flu” for your kids or “maximum peak of flu germs around…get flu”.
    But people OFTEN make the mistake of thinking it could ONLY be the first and FORGET about the second. Maybe because they forget that flu shots don’t take effect right away.

  2. Linda
    Reply

    I did a lot of research on this for myself. 20 and above prevents gross bone diseases like rickets and osteomalacia in most people but most labs and hospitals think that having it above 30 is better. That is VERY mainstream and not at all “new” or out there… my doc is very conservative and prefers 30.
    It is SAFE to have it up to 100 I’ve read. The lab values for “normal” on my hospital test say “30-80″ for these units.
    Many researchers think in fact that Higher than 30 is better. The values and RDA are based on preventing bone problems before science knew that vit D also functions as a hormone. It is looking like you need more than 30, some say, to fulfill all it’s uses including as an immune regulator.
    Almost everyone has to take a lot more Vit D than the RDA to get values up. Myself, to get mine to 63–smack in my hospitals normal range…. I personally need to take 4000mg per day. I have titrated it and on 3000 mine is only 34 and my doc wanted it higher. Yet she was not comfortable with me taking more than the conservative 2000 that AMA says is safe. I pointed out I could not follow both her advice to get it up and to take only 2000mgs per day. She saw my point and agrees that the blood value justifies whatever you need to take within reason to get to it.

  3. Karen
    Reply

    If I could be sure that any flu would be gone within 18 hours and one bout of headache, I probably wouldn’t be taking the flu shot either. Problem is, my history indicates that real flu is the same, over at least 5-7 days, plus another week of chasing down the secondary problems that all too often follow.
    The rabies vaccination, plus immunoglobulin, knocked me flat. Less so than rabies itself, I’m sure, or the infections you can get from dog bites. Ditto a recent tetanus shot, which gave me pretty horrible dreams. Don’t want to think about the kind of dreams I’d get from the real infection.
    YMMV.

What Do You Think?

Share your thoughts with others, but be mindful of protecting your own and others' privacy. Not all comments will be posted. Advice from web visitors is not a substitute for medical attention. Do not stop any medicine without checking with the prescriber. In posting a comment, you agree to our commenting policy and website terms and conditions.